|
Bio statementResearch | Health 2.0 & Medicine2.0 | Participatory Healthcare | Wikis | Exercise Physiology | Speedskating | Snowboarding | Road cycling & Mountainbiking ConferencesAttended Medicine 2.0'10 (Maastricht, NL) Attended Medicine 2.0'11 (Stanford University, USA) Accepted AbstractsMedicine 2.0'10 (Maastricht, NL)Definition of Health 2.0: a Systematic Review Background: During the last decade, the Internet has become increasingly popular and is now an important part of our daily life. In the Netherlands, the Internet is even more popular than traditional media like television, radio, and newspapers. Furthermore, the impact of the Internet and other technological developments on health care is expected to increase. When new “Web 2.0” technologies are used in health care, the term “Health 2.0” may be used. A clear definition is important f... Medicine 2.0'11 (Stanford University, USA)Social Media in European Hospitals: A Descriptive Study Background Internet and Social Media are an important part of daily life. Social media (SoMe) like Twitter, Linkedin and Facebook, improve communication and patient participation in health care. Patients and professionals use SoMe for multiple disease related forms of communication. An American initiative showed that many hospitals in the USA are using SoMe. However, it is unknown whether hospitals in Western Europe use SoMe, and which types of SoMe they are using. The objective of this stud... Wikis as an Opportunity to Improve Patient Participation in Developing Information Leaflets: A demonstration project in infertility patients. Background In the process of developing patient information, the participation of end-users, is often rare. Usually, healthcare professionals alone create the information with little to no patient input. This is a missed opportunity, as they have gained a wealth of experience based on the knowledge of their disease. Clinicians are also seldom trained in estimating patients’ information needs and describing them in layman’s terms. Thus, we hypothesized that utilizing the experience-base o... Medicine 2.0'12 (Boston, USA)Wikis and Collaborative Writing Applications in Health Care: Preliminary Results of a Scoping Review Background: The use of collaborative writing applications by clinicians and other health care actors is presently growing. Although wikis, Google Documents and similar collaborative writing applications may be useful in facilitating knowledge transfer, no systematic review has yet been conducted to evaluate their role in knowledge translation (KT). Objective: This study is exploring the depth and breadth of evidence about the safe, effective and ethical use of collaborative writing applica... Full Paper PublicationsJMIR Research ProtocolsWikis and Collaborative Writing Applications in Health Care: A Scoping Review Protocol Journal of Medical Internet ResearchUse of Social Media by Western European Hospitals: Longitudinal Study Published WithThis user's work may be related toUsers who have said they are friend/colleague of Tom van de BeltUsers who identified Tom van de Belt as friend/colleague and who Tom van de Belt considers friends/colleaguesUsers who Tom van de Belt said they have metUsers who said they have met Tom van de BeltUsers who have said they have met Tom van de Belt and who Tom van de Belt says they have metUsers who said they want to meet Tom van de BeltFans of Tom van de Belt |
Click here to edit your profile page
Medicine 2.0® is happy to support and promote other conferences and workshops in this area. Contact us to produce and promote your conference or workshop under this label and in this event series. In addition, we are always looking for hosts of future World Congresses.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 License.









LucienEngelen8364
Lexvan Velsen